Ʊ°ì¹½Â¤¤Î¥á¥¿¥Õ¥¡¡¼¡§½¸¹çÏÀ¤È¥Þ¥Ã¥Ô¥ó¥°´Ø¿ô¤«¤é¼Ú¤ê¤¿Æ±°ì¹½Â¤¤È¤Ï¡¢Æó¤Ä¤Î½¸¹ç¤ÎÃæ¤ÎÂоݤ¬¡¢°ìÂаì¤Î¥Þ¥Ã¥Ô¥ó¥°¤ò¤·¤Æ¤ª¤ê¡¢°ì¤Ä¤Î½¸¹ç¤ÎÍ×ÁÇ£±¤ÈÍ×ÁÇ£²¤Î´Ø·¸À­¤¬¡¢¤â¤¦°ì¤Ä¤Î½¸¹ç¤ÎÍ×ÁÇ£±¤ÈÍ×ÁÇ£²¤Î´Ø·¸À­¤Ë¤â¶À¤Î¤è¤¦¤ËÂбþ¤·¤Æ¤¤¤ë¤â¤Î¤Ç¤¹¡£

¼ÂºÝŪ¤Ê¸ÀÍդǤ¤¤¦¤È¡¢ÂÐ¾Ý¤ÎÆó¤Ä¤Î½¸¹ç¤È¤¤¤¦¤Î¤Ï¡¢¥¯¥é¥¤¥¢¥ó¥È¤Î¼ÂºÝ¤Î¸½¾õ¤È¡¢¤½¤Î¥¯¥é¥¤¥¢¥ó¥È¤Î¸½¾õ¤¬¥Þ¥Ã¥Ô¥ó¥°¤µ¤ì¤¿ÈæÓÈŪ¤Ê¾ì¤È¤¤¤¦¤³¤È¤Ë¤Ê¤ê¤Þ¤¹¡£Æ±°ì¹½Â¤¤ÎÄêµÁ¤Ë¤Î¤Ã¤È¤ê¡¢ÈæÓÈŪ¤Ê¾ì¤Ë¤Ï¥¯¥é¥¤¥¢¥ó¥È¤Î¸½¾õ¤Ë¤¢¤ëÍ×ÁǤȶÀ¤Î¤è¤¦¤ËÂбþ¤¹¤ëÍ×ÁǤ¬¤¢¤ê¡¢¤½¤ì¤é¤Ï¡¢¥¯¥é¥¤¥¢¥ó¥È¤Î¸½¾õ¤Ë¤¢¤ëÍ×ÁǤ¬»ý¤Ä´Ø·¸À­¤ÈƱ¤¸´Ø·¸À­¤ò»ý¤Ä¤³¤È¤Ë¤Ê¤ê¤Þ¤¹¡£

Âç¤Þ¤«¤Ç¡¢Ã±½ã²½¤µ¤ì¤¿Îã¤ò¤¢¤²¤ë¤È¡¢¤¢¤Ê¤¿¤Î¥¯¥é¥¤¥¢¥ó¥È¤¬10Âå¤Î̼¤ò»ý¤ÄÊì¿Æ¤À¤È¤·¤Þ¤·¤ç¤¦¡£¤½¤Î̼¤Ï¡¢Å¬Àڤʤ³¤È¤Ç¤¹¤¬¡¢Êì¿Æ¤«¤é¼«Î©¤·¤è¤¦¤È¤â¤¬¤¤¤Æ¤¤¤Þ¤¹¡£Êì¿Æ¤Ï¡¢Ì¼¤ò¼é¤ë¤¿¤á¤Ë¤è¤«¤ì¤È»×¤Ã¤Æ¡¢¤¢¤Þ¤ê¤Ë¤â¿¤¯¤ÎÀ©¸Â¤ò̼¤Ë²Ý¤·¤Æ¤¤¤ë¤Î¤Ç¡¢Ì¼¤Ï¼«Î©¤¹¤ë¤¿¤á¤ËɬÍפÊÂ賤¬¤Ç¤­¤Ê¤¤¤Ç¤¤¤Þ¤¹¡£¤³¤³¤Ç»ä¤¿¤Á¤Ï¡¢°ì¤Ä¤ÎŬÀÚ¤ÊÈæÓȤξì¤È¤·¤Æ¡¢±à·Ý¤Î¼ÂÁ©¤È¤¤¤¦¾ì¤òÁªÂò¤Ç¤­¤ë¤³¤È¤Ëµ¤¤Å¤¤¤Æ²¼¤µ¤¤¡£

¤µ¤é¤Ë¡¢»ä¤¿¤Á¤Ï¡¢£±ÂУ±¤Î¥Þ¥Ã¥Ô¥ó¥°Êý¼°¤Ç¡¢Êì¿Æ¤ò±à·Ý²È¡¢Ì¼¤ò¥Ð¥é¤ÎÄãÌڤγô¤ËÂбþ¤µ¤»¤ÆÉ½¤¹¤³¤È¤¬¤Ç¤­¤Þ¤¹¡£¤â¤·±à·Ý²È¤¬¡¢¤½¤Î¥Ð¥é¤Î³ô¤¬Èþ¤·¤¯¤Ï¤Ä¤é¤Ä¤È¤·¤¿¡¢¤«¤°¤ï¤·¤¤¥Ð¥é¤Î²Ö¤òºé¤«¤»¤ë³ô¤ËÀ®Ä¹¤·¤ÆÍߤ·¤¤¤È»×¤¤¡¢³ô¤Î¤³¤È¤ò¿´ÇÛ¤¹¤ë¤¢¤Þ¤ê¡¢¿·¤·¤¯À®Ä¹¤·¤¿Éôʬ¡Ê¤Ä¤Ü¤ß¤ò´Þ¤á¤Æ¡Ë¤ò¤¹¤Ù¤ÆÅ¦¤ß¼è¤Ã¤Æ¤·¤Þ¤Ã¤¿¤é¡¢¤½¤Î²á¾ê¤Ê´ÉÍý¡Ê²á¾ê¤ÊŦ¤ß¼è¤ê¡Ë¤¬¡¢¼Â¤Ï¡¢¤½¤Î³ô¤¬À®½Ï¤·¡¢¶¯¤¯¤Ï¤Ä¤é¤Ä¤È¤·¤¿²Ö¤òºé¤«¤»¤ë¸»¤Ë¤Ê¤ë¤³¤È¤ò˸¤²¤Æ¤·¤Þ¤¤¤Þ¤¹¡£±à·Ý²È¡Ê¤½¤·¤Æ±à·Ý²È¤¬É½¤¹Êì¿Æ¡Ë¤Î°Õ¿Þ¤È¤ÏµÕ¤Î¤³¤È¤¬µ¯¤³¤ë¤Î¤Ç¤¹¡£¤³¤Îñ½ã¤ÊÎã¤ÎÃæ¤Ë¤Ï¡¢£±ÂУ±¤Î¥Þ¥Ã¥Ô¥ó¥°¤¬¤¢¤ë¤³¤È¤Î¤¤µ¤¤Å¤¤¤Æ¤¯¤À¤µ¤¤¡£

¡¡¡¡¡¡Êì¿Æ¡á±à·Ý²È¡¡¡¡¡¡Ì¼¡á¥Ð¥é¤Î³ô

¤µ¤é¤Ë¡¢±à·Ý²È¤È¥Ð¥é¤Î³ô¤Î´Ø·¸À­¤Ï¡¢Êì¿Æ¤È̼¤Î´Ø·¸À­¤ÈƱ¤¸¤Ç¤¹¡£¤³¤Î·Á¼°¡ÊƱ°ì¹½Â¤¡Ë¤Ë¤ª¤¤¤Æ¤Ï¡¢£±ÂУ±¤Î¥Þ¥Ã¥Ô¥ó¥°¤¬¡¢Å¬Àڤ˥¯¥é¥¤¥¢¥ó¥È¤Î°Õ¼±Åª¤Ê¥Þ¥¤¥ó¥É¤Îµ¤¤ò¤½¤é¤»¡¢º®Í𤵤»¤Þ¤¹¤¬¡¢°ìÊý¤Ç¡¢´Ø·¸À­¤òƱ¤¸¹½Â¤¤ËÊݤäƤ¤¤ë¤¿¤á¡¢¥¯¥é¥¤¥¢¥ó¥È¤Î̵°Õ¼±¤Ï´Êñ¤Ë¥á¥¿¥Õ¥¡¡¼¤ÎÃæ¤Îʪ¡Ê¥Ð¥é¤Î³ô¡¢±à·Ý²È¡Ë¤¬¸½¾õ¤Ëɽ¤ì¤Æ¤¤¤ëÌäÂê¡ÊÊì¤È̼¤Î³ëÆ£¡Ë¤ÎÃæ¤ÎÅоì¿Íʪ¤òɽ¤·¤Æ¤¤¤ë¤ÈÍý²ò¤Ç¤­¤ë¤Î¤Ç¤¹¡£¡Ê¥ï¡¼¥¯¥·¥ç¥Ã¥×¡Ö¥á¥¿¥Õ¥¡¡¼¤È¥Ð¥¿¥Õ¥é¥¤¡Ë¡Áʪ¸ì¤ÎËâË¡¤ò³Ø¤Ö¡×¥Æ¥­¥¹¥È¤è¤ê¡Ë.

ÁϺî²èÁü










Isomorphic metaphor:
an isomorphism, a borrowing from set theory and mapping functions, is a one-to-one mapping between two sets of objects such that the relationships between the elements, e1 and e2, are preserved in the mapping by the counterparts in the second set of the elements. Thus e1 and e2 have the same relationship, R; a relationship that is mirrored by the counterparts of the seoriginal elements in the second set.

Now, in practical terms, the two sets of objects are the actual present stateof the client and the metaphoric space onto which the elements of the presentstate are mapped. As required by the definition of isomorphism, the metaphoric space will contain the counterparts of the elements of the present state andthose counterpart elements will have the same relationships in the metaphoric space as the original elements had in the present state of the client

As a crude and oversimplified example - suppose that your client is a mother of a teenage daughter who is struggling to (appropriately) achieve independence ofher mother. Further, the mother, with the best of intentions (to protect herdaughter) is imposing so many restrictions on her daughter that she (the daughter) is unable to have precisely the set of experiences that will allowher to achieve her independence Notice that we could select as one appropriate metaphoric space the practice of horticulture (growing things).

Further, we might represent (in the one-to-one mapping) the mother as the gardener and the daughter as a rose bush. If the gardener, with the best of intention (to have the rose bush grow into a beautiful, resilient and aromic source of roses) were so concerned about the rose bush that she would trim allnew growth (including buds) off the rose bush, the over management of the rosebush (the excessive pruning) would in fact, prevent the rose bush from achieving maturity and b...ecoming the strong resilient source of beautiful roses-the opposite of the intention of the gardener (and the mother that thegardener represents). Notice is this simple example that there is a one-to-one mapping

¡¡¡¡¡¡mother = gardener¡¡¡¡¡¡daughter= rose bush

Further, the relationship between the gardener and the rose bush is the same as the relationship between the mother and the daughter. In this form (isomorphism)the one-to-one mapping will adequately distract or confuse the conscious mindof the client while preserving the relationship will allow the unconscious ofthe client to easily appreciate which metaphor object (the rose bush, the gardener) stands for or represents the characters in the actual presenting problem (the conflict between the mother and the daughter

John&Carmen
















NLP
¶¦Æ±Áϻϼԥ¸¥ç¥ó¡¦¥°¥ê¥ó¥À¡¼Çî»ÎǧÄê¹»
¥Ë¥å¡¼¥³¡¼¥ÉNLP¥¹¥¯¡¼¥ë
¥í¥´¥Þ¡¼¥¯







µ­»ö¹¹¿·Æü¡§2020/06/12